JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)January 30, 2017

A- de 2017

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Gloria Stella Ortiz Delgado

✓Claimant Darwin Ayrton Moreno Hurtado

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

The case-law reporter has not yet indexed topics for this decision. The summary below describes what it is about.
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Incidente de desacato en el marco de la Sentencia T-462/15.

Antes de que la Corte se pronuncie sobre el cumplimiento de la orden consagrada en el numeral 7º de la precitada providencia, la Sala de Revisión dispone poner en conocimiento de la Ministra de Relaciones Exteriores el presente auto, para que remita un informe al Despacho de la Magistrada Ponente en el que indique cuáles han sido las actuaciones ejercidas para la designación del representante judicial del señor Darwin Ayrton Moreno Hurtado, ante la Justicia del Reino Unido.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. RESUELVE
  2. DISPONER que la Secretaria General de esta Corporacion ponga en conocimiento el contenido de este auto a la Ministra de Relaciones Exteriores, doctora MARIA ANGELA HOLGUIN CUELLAR, para que dentro de los cinco (5) dias siguientes a la notificacion de esta providencia remita un informe al despacho de la Magistrada sustanciadora en el que indique cuales han sido las actuaciones ejercidas para la designacion del representante judicial del senor Darwin Ayrton Moreno Hurtado ante la Justicia del Reino Unido.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela